1995-08-21 - Re: Liability for Key Cracking in Idle Hours?

Header Data

From: Damien.Doligez@inria.fr (Damien Doligez)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 43ffda980a1e65cdadf93887bd3ce904787d95345a039bb53285a5b62fdbe540
Message ID: <9508211914.AA19431@couchey.inria.fr>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-21 19:14:34 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 21 Aug 95 12:14:34 PDT

Raw message

From: Damien.Doligez@inria.fr (Damien Doligez)
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 95 12:14:34 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re:  Liability for Key Cracking in Idle Hours?
Message-ID: <9508211914.AA19431@couchey.inria.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Damien may be able to tell us if Ecole Polytechnique has raised any
>questions about his highly-publicized attack on the SSL Challenge key.

Well, I asked for permission before I used the machines, so I don't
expect any problem.  (Actually, I asked for the permission, then
launched the processes, then got the permission, but it doesn't make
any difference, does it ?  I should have also asked permission for
putting their name in my announce, though.)

It seems that the Herald Tribune called them about a cracker, and they
refused to comment.  They must have gone in paranoid mode, because
they've had lots of trouble with student crackers in the past, and
there is currently not even one student on the campus.  But now, the
situation seems to be in control, although I had no official contact
from Ecole Polytechnique.

Ecole Normale Superieure did not react at all.  They're all on
vacation anyway.

By the way, "cypherpunks" keep getting mentioned in interviews with
the press.  I hope that's OK with you all.

-- Damien





Thread