1995-08-17 - Re: First known … (stop this thread please)

Header Data

From: “Marcel van der Peijl” <bigmac@digicash.com>
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: 4fa1cc35762e8950c027e525821f65907b360e3e98076532582117995ecc230d
Message ID: <199508171918.VAA17926@digicash.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-17 19:19:13 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 17 Aug 95 12:19:13 PDT

Raw message

From: "Marcel van der Peijl" <bigmac@digicash.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 95 12:19:13 PDT
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: First known ... (stop this thread please)
Message-ID: <199508171918.VAA17926@digicash.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Also, there are other potential claims for this sort of thing. Based on
> varying extents to which the "electronic money" is really secure, is
> cryptographically interesting, etc.

Sorry, I think we should kill this thread while we're still on top of 
it. The discussion was CyberBucks, not electronic payments or 
anything like that. I _KNOW_ what the first transaction was, since I 
made it, I saw it at the bank, I received the goods, and got an email 
from the sender saying it was the first transaction.

I do not wish to take claim for any of that other stuff, whether it
is Chaumian or not. No doubt somebody traded some baseball cards for
a few bits somewhere back in the fifties. Let's not dig up any other
dead bodies. My claim (which was only to show the incorrectness of
the other) is a very restrictive one, and is only for the CyberBucks
trading.

// Marcel van der Peijl, DigiCash bv, http://www.digicash.com/~bigmac/
// The hottest instruction on a P90? JMP $ @ 2.633A or 52C (with fan)





Thread