1995-08-16 - Re: Phone call for Mr. Doligez, was Re: SSL challenge – broken !

Header Data

From: Jason Weisberger <jweis@primenet.com>
To: pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)
Message Hash: 586f9b22d567bccab082fce4644d8178d300a64f6a0ac856215182ea46d9179a
Message ID: <199508161832.LAA28361@usr5.primenet.com>
Reply To: <199508161654.MAA25878@access5.digex.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-16 18:32:41 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 16 Aug 95 11:32:41 PDT

Raw message

From: Jason Weisberger <jweis@primenet.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 95 11:32:41 PDT
To: pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)
Subject: Re: Phone call for Mr. Doligez, was Re: SSL challenge -- broken !
In-Reply-To: <199508161654.MAA25878@access5.digex.net>
Message-ID: <199508161832.LAA28361@usr5.primenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


> 
> I don't think that there is any serious worry for Netscape. Their
> security is fine-- it's just crippled by the US Government. They
> could probably start distributing binary versions of their software
> that used full 128 bit keys in several hours. It's just that the
> Government gets pissed off about these things.
> 

I have to agree, Netscape may spend some energy to upgrade their 
encryption, but it really won't buy them all that much.   SSL, to me, is 
like using a "security envelope" to mail cash or putting the club on your 
car.  It presents just enough of an obstacle to keep honest people honest.

jweis@primenet.com
http://www.qtime.com/~jweis




Thread