1995-08-24 - server congestion?
Header Data
From: Christian Wettergren <cwe@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
To: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
Message Hash: 59a868a2b29ddba736a3a2411a830ea041a9176dac5dcd3fc99d58df196b8583
Message ID: <199508242214.PAA25424@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-24 22:14:53 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 24 Aug 95 15:14:53 PDT
Raw message
From: Christian Wettergren <cwe@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 95 15:14:53 PDT
To: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
Subject: server congestion?
Message-ID: <199508242214.PAA25424@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Couldn't one take advantage of the 50.000 mistake, by
setting up a second server for that space. I guess
things will screw up when the first server reaches
FFFF, as indicated earlier.
What would be nice is if one could divide up the key
between servers also.
Another thing that might decrease the load on the server
is if we start allocating more blocks at a time, lets
say 2-4 blocks each time. Wouldn't that help?
/Christian
Thread
Return to August 1995
- Return to “Alex Tang <altitude@cic.net>”
- Return to “Christian Wettergren <cwe@Csli.Stanford.EDU>”
- Return to “Jason Weisberger <jweis@primenet.com>”
Return to “Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk>”
- 1995-08-24 (Thu, 24 Aug 95 15:14:53 PDT) - server congestion? - Christian Wettergren <cwe@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
- 1995-08-24 (Thu, 24 Aug 95 16:01:39 PDT) - Re: server congestion? - Jason Weisberger <jweis@primenet.com>
- 1995-08-24 (Thu, 24 Aug 95 16:03:43 PDT) - Re: server congestion? - Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk>
- 1995-08-24 (Thu, 24 Aug 95 16:08:05 PDT) - Re: server congestion? - Christian Wettergren <cwe@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
- 1995-08-25 (Thu, 24 Aug 95 19:54:00 PDT) - Re: server congestion? - Alex Tang <altitude@cic.net>