1995-08-11 - Re: More “S-1” foolishness

Header Data

From: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
To: Carl Ellison <cme@tis.com>
Message Hash: 698cff89fe7d056b3843c144e721d3e76a1505fb5edeb6c4d99ecc1212bbde7d
Message ID: <199508112221.SAA27518@crypto.com>
Reply To: <9508112119.AA13790@tis.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-11 22:13:20 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 11 Aug 95 15:13:20 PDT

Raw message

From: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 95 15:13:20 PDT
To: Carl Ellison <cme@tis.com>
Subject: Re: More "S-1" foolishness
In-Reply-To: <9508112119.AA13790@tis.com>
Message-ID: <199508112221.SAA27518@crypto.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>For that matter, fullkey will be a constant for any key with all the bytes
>the same.  This might constitute a class of weak keys.

Interestingly, though, such keys are not weak in the sense that the
all-zero/all-one key is weak in DES.  There doesn't seem to be any
obvious way to key it such that encryption == decryption.

-matt





Thread