From: klbarrus@infocom.net (Karl L. Barrus)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6bccb833b1e0d6b3cc80d554bae4a5ebaf8f2d27000dfa4439c1d67348d4b70a
Message ID: <199508150325.WAA08157@infocom.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-15 03:25:50 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 14 Aug 95 20:25:50 PDT
From: klbarrus@infocom.net (Karl L. Barrus)
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 95 20:25:50 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Q's on Number Theory/Quadriatic Residues
Message-ID: <199508150325.WAA08157@infocom.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>How are these square roots? 9 is certainly not the square root of 11, nor is
>8 the square root of 29, even modulo 35.
What this means is that 9^2 mod 35 = 11, and 8^2 mod 35 = 29. See the list
right above the chart that is confusing you.
For example, it lists x^2 = 29 mod 35 has a solution: x = 8,13,22,27
So actually there are 3 other solutions... 13, 22, and 27 are also square
roots of 29 mod 35.
>[ 1/v vs. v-1]
>Are these two expressions interchangeable
Yes.
>3)Speaking of errata, where can I find a copy?
Hm... I forgot. I have one somewhere and will send it along if I find it.
>Is it possible to predict the possible quadriatic residues, or is an
Yes, you can use the Jacobi symbol to determine if a is a quadratic residue
mod n. See page 207.
>5)From what does Feige-Fiat-Shamir derive its security?
Difficulty of factoring.
--
Karl L. Barrus <klbarrus@infocom.net>
Return to August 1995
Return to “klbarrus@infocom.net (Karl L. Barrus)”
1995-08-15 (Mon, 14 Aug 95 20:25:50 PDT) - Re: Q’s on Number Theory/Quadriatic Residues - klbarrus@infocom.net (Karl L. Barrus)