From: Scott Brickner <sjb@austin.ibm.com>
To: Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
Message Hash: 7841d42ea32cfa8b8d7725ee2e65cbc7ca13cd1c18a2286c12da5a3c94164bfe
Message ID: <9508291847.AA12145@ozymandias.austin.ibm.com>
Reply To: <199508290556.WAA12070@desiree.teleport.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-29 18:48:20 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 29 Aug 95 11:48:20 PDT
From: Scott Brickner <sjb@austin.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 95 11:48:20 PDT
To: Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
Subject: Re: Florida Drivers Permits and a Hello
In-Reply-To: <199508290556.WAA12070@desiree.teleport.com>
Message-ID: <9508291847.AA12145@ozymandias.austin.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Alan Olsen writes
>They would not have to include an entire thumbprint. The actual code used
>to verify fingerprints is not very large. All that would be needed is
>enough information to ID into the "official" records and enough checksum
>type information to prevent alteration/counterfitting. Using magnetic media
>for this is a bit foolish as it can be changed/destroyed with the stroke of
>a magnet. I will not say by what means I would think should suit as a
>better encoding scheme because: 1) They are not using it and 2) I do not
>want to give them any ideas.
What possible value could the LEAs get by having your thumbprint digitally
encoded on your driver's license? It's not like the average cop-on-the-beat
is qualified to lift a fingerprint and compare it. Even if he was, how
does it benefit that the fingerprint is on the license?
This seems silly.
Return to August 1995
Return to “Scott Brickner <sjb@austin.ibm.com>”