From: Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
To: mark@lochard.com.au (Mark)
Message Hash: 89aa0e6d3db1f1f2382c8a2e660d997fd062eb0c0fbf0c49543318db33088c43
Message ID: <199508280649.QAA12896@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
Reply To: <199508280134.AA19987@junkers.lochard.com.au>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-28 06:51:51 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 27 Aug 95 23:51:51 PDT
From: Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 95 23:51:51 PDT
To: mark@lochard.com.au (Mark)
Subject: Auto-update (was: Re: SSl challenge - it was fun!)
In-Reply-To: <199508280134.AA19987@junkers.lochard.com.au>
Message-ID: <199508280649.QAA12896@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sorry if I stuff up; I'm trying for PGP-signed and the PGP is on
a different machine...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hello Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
and scmayo@rschp1.anu.edu.au (Sherry Mayo)
and cypherpunks@toad.com
...[asking for an auto-update]...
> I would be extremely wary of this as accepting code written by someone else to
> automatically run on your machine is bad.
...
Why?
I wouldn't say "bad".
I'd say "you need to know what you are doing".
...
> If they do
> not have the expertise, they will hear of it soon enough when others scan the
> offered code.
...
Perhaps there should be a mechanism whereby code offered would be
signed by various parites. When sufficient signatures have collected,
auto-update can proceed.
Yes, no, maybe?
Jiri
- --
If you want an answer, please mail to <jirib@cs.monash.edu.au>.
On sweeney, I may delete without reading!
PGP 463A14D5 (but it's at home so it'll take a day or two)
PGP EF0607F9 (but it's at uni so don't rely on it too much)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i
iQCVAwUBMEFmuixV6mvvBgf5AQEkRwP/TUorbtcmElHjWVrxJ8KoTlM0D3/oK4xh
Jh4+QLGaH/aNvI5ehdhPjn+tFXwL/ONS+J/pzO0b2cP9GcM3D6PvtUWxmsTwwaMh
jXkctAPIuO24nb0cAXtcj7LlUe4s5DqIVvkCYi8UrdPXrYEV5DaKti4MYD7oShgC
XMkzzcv55bQ=
=wa8h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to August 1995
Return to “Sherry Mayo <scmayo@rschp1.anu.edu.au>”