From: koontz@MasPar.COM (David G. Koontz)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8aa5bcbd37c722be2b5052200cc9cadf8bb33dac4a8c773c8032c541743330b6
Message ID: <9508101902.AA15691@argosy.MasPar.COM>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-10 18:58:55 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 10 Aug 95 11:58:55 PDT
From: koontz@MasPar.COM (David G. Koontz)
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 95 11:58:55 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "S1" encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting)
Message-ID: <9508101902.AA15691@argosy.MasPar.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>Jon writes:
>> Two other possibilities: (1) It's merely an independently produced
>> cryptosystem disguised as a "leak" to save its creator the trouble of
>> asking experts to analyze it for him/her.
>It strikes me as rather foolish to mail off anonymous copies to several
>individual recipients (Matt, Perry, Tim, ...) in addition to the list, if
>S1 is a real leak. Why aid the traffic analysts by firing off multiple
>messages through the remailers ?
A third possibility comes to mind, that person or persons associated with
the list are using the post to focus on cryptographic efforts in lieu of
political or apocalyptic diatribes.
Return to August 1995
Return to “koontz@MasPar.COM (David G. Koontz)”
1995-08-10 (Thu, 10 Aug 95 11:58:55 PDT) - Re: “S1” encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting) - koontz@MasPar.COM (David G. Koontz)