From: Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk>
To: “David K. Merriman” <merriman@arn.net>
Message Hash: 9471385f91a32f0b42c6b605590155d17bc52cbce6373cc5cc30441d48246900
Message ID: <“swan.cl.cam.:178620:950825210158”@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Reply To: <199508251929.OAA15415@arnet.arn.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-25 21:02:25 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 25 Aug 95 14:02:25 PDT
From: Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 95 14:02:25 PDT
To: "David K. Merriman" <merriman@arn.net>
Subject: Re: ssl challenge
In-Reply-To: <199508251929.OAA15415@arnet.arn.net>
Message-ID: <"swan.cl.cam.:178620:950825210158"@cl.cam.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> > option to output results to a file (or files, so we can maintain
> local logging of results: ie, CHAL2a.dat, CHAL2b.dat, etc).
Done -- in brl0.06
The whole code runs without writing any files, so it defaults to /dev/null,
but you can point it whatre you like (e.g. logkeys=log-`uname -n`)
> > a Windows 3.1 variant (or even win32s)
Not my area ....
> Maybe next challenge, we can pre-allocate keyspace based on the results of
> this one: look at how fast folks are reporting results, and allocate chunks
> of space accordingly (maybe based on an 8-hour 'cycle'). Sure take some of
> the load off the poor server :-)
It would seem reasonable to allocate say "2/3rds of what you scanned last time"
in advance ...
Return to August 1995
Return to “Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk>”