1995-08-05 - Secure FileSystem vs Secure Device

Header Data

From: gjeffers@socketis.net (Gary Jeffers)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a030fc3e3db841b0a19dd25a5ec35e2f9ed3cd03291aeaa52a563204aa3fd1e3
Message ID: <199508051026.FAA16096@mail.socketis.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-05 08:12:44 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 5 Aug 95 01:12:44 PDT

Raw message

From: gjeffers@socketis.net (Gary Jeffers)
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 95 01:12:44 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Secure FileSystem vs Secure Device
Message-ID: <199508051026.FAA16096@mail.socketis.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


         Secure FileSystem vs Secure Device

Cypherpunks,

   I have been studing the software package SFS110 ( Secure File-
System) version 1.10 by Peter Gutmann. I originally wanted to use
SECDEV (Secure Device) but mistook Secure File System for it. I have
heard references to Secure Device on Cypherpunks but I have heard
nothing about Secure FileSystem.

   Does anyone have knowledge of both of these systems & can give me
advice on which is superior? Also, I found Secure Device compressed
with a .arj compression system. What is this compression method? Is
there a DOS version of Secure Device?

   I have done some preliminary reading of Secure FileSystem & I find
it to be very impressive! So, why no mention on Cypherpunks? Is Secure
Device that much superior or has Secure FileSystem just been over-
looked? Also, what are the latest version numbers of both of them?

                                 PUSH EM BACK! PUSH EM BACK!
                                 WWWAAAYYYY   BBBAAACCCCK!
                                 BBBEEEAAATTTT  STATE!
                                 Gary Jeffers







Thread