1995-08-25 - Re: Linux brutessl client

Header Data

From: Christian Wettergren <cwe@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
To: ghio@cmu.edu (Matthew Ghio)
Message Hash: a2cbe579ed8fc161eb821fa02986df20f1b27be908b54f3cad2ff59a03b83c24
Message ID: <199508250023.RAA28560@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <m0slm0V-000wQYC@myriad>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-25 00:24:13 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 24 Aug 95 17:24:13 PDT

Raw message

From: Christian Wettergren <cwe@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 95 17:24:13 PDT
To: ghio@cmu.edu (Matthew Ghio)
Subject: Re: Linux brutessl client
In-Reply-To: <m0slm0V-000wQYC@myriad>
Message-ID: <199508250023.RAA28560@Csli.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



| I get 11100 keys/sec with Linux/gcc 2.5.8 on a 486/66, optimized with
| -O2 and -fomit-frame-pointer.
| 
| -fforce-mem and -funroll-loops made the program run more slowly.
| 
| I also tried -ffast-math -finline-functions -fforce-addr -fcaller-saves
| which seemed to make no difference.

I've tried to optimize the SunOS binary, but it seems as if 16400
keys/s is the maximum I can get on a SS10. No changes in optimization
flags has helped so far.

Has anyone got a better speed than this on a ordinary ss10, with SunOS
414?

/Christian






Thread