1995-08-11 - Re: PRZ encrypted voice software release imminent

Header Data

From: cman@communities.com (Douglas Barnes)
To: “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
Message Hash: a2e1119761f67d9c9e39ad8347d7c22878046961a49948876f7854582432b61e
Message ID: <v02120d06ac515d75289e@[199.2.22.120]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-11 18:25:39 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 11 Aug 95 11:25:39 PDT

Raw message

From: cman@communities.com (Douglas Barnes)
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 95 11:25:39 PDT
To: "Vladimir Z. Nuri" <vznuri@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: PRZ encrypted voice software release imminent
Message-ID: <v02120d06ac515d75289e@[199.2.22.120]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Of course, if it was a substantial improvement over the
other "Internet Phone" stuff that's out there, and had
a good way of dealing with switching, etc., then people
would use it to make "free" l.d. phone calls on the net,
and the cryptography would get a free ride.

Generally, you are right in suggesting that anything that
requires people to crawl behind their computers, attach
new cables, purchase and debug a sound card under Windows,
and generally engage in techno-weenie hardware manipulations
will have less appeal than something plug and play. Even
given the extremely user-hostile elements of PGP the software,
I would be surprised if PGPFone became as popular.







Thread