1995-08-04 - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@panix.com>
To: strick at Jihad <strick@yak.net>
Message Hash: b3a5674acdf30bd32f0c76b7ca3bcd8effa3279a8b056870d7e638866c5a1f99
Message ID: <199508041310.JAA02958@panix4.panix.com>
Reply To: <199508032138.VAA00125@jihad.yak.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-04 13:10:51 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 4 Aug 95 06:10:51 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@panix.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 95 06:10:51 PDT
To: strick at Jihad <strick@yak.net>
Subject: Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel
In-Reply-To: <199508032138.VAA00125@jihad.yak.net>
Message-ID: <199508041310.JAA02958@panix4.panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



strick at Jihad writes:
> Perry -- do you have the same basic objection to Safe-TCL that you do
> do to Java?  I would think so.

I do, but not as strongly. The language is much more constrained and
actually does have a lot of the evil bits ripped clear out (or at
least they could be ripped out.)

Perry

Thread

• Return to August 1995

• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@panix.com>”
• Return to “Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>”

• Return to “strick at Jihad <strick@yak.net>”

• Unknown thread root
  • 1995-08-03 (Thu, 3 Aug 95 15:42:08 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - strick at Jihad <strick@yak.net>
    • 1995-08-04 (Fri, 4 Aug 95 06:10:51 PDT) - Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@panix.com>
      • 1995-08-04 (Fri, 4 Aug 95 07:59:58 PDT) - Java and Safe-TCL security (was Re: Java, Netscape, OpenDoc, and Babel) - Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>