1995-08-21 - Re: WhiSSLing in the Dark

Header Data

From: Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
To: N/A
Message Hash: b5b05d54240ef794fa7924ea57b2738d8b910bf5b3983dd3741e431a43807539
Message ID: <199508210459.OAA03641@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
Reply To: <199508182201.AAA27435@utopia.hacktic.nl>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-21 05:00:14 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 20 Aug 95 22:00:14 PDT

Raw message

From: Jiri Baum <jirib@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 95 22:00:14 PDT
Subject: Re: WhiSSLing in the Dark
In-Reply-To: <199508182201.AAA27435@utopia.hacktic.nl>
Message-ID: <199508210459.OAA03641@sweeney.cs.monash.edu.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Hello cypherpunks@toad.com

Anybody get the feeling someone is writing off their computers real fast?

...
> In home computer terms, Doligez guesses a network of
> about 80 Intel Pentium-based machines would be equivalent
...
> at around $10,000, meaning there are many more economical
...


Okay,
  80 Pentiums, at 2000 each, makes 160 000.
  8 days per attack, 10 000 per attack, makes cost of attack 1250/day

  160 000 / 1 250 = 128 days.

Anybody's Pentiums actually wear out after half a year?

You could question my 2000 figure, but even at 5000 it'd still be just
a year. Cost of capital doesn't change by more than 10% in that time.


Hope I'm making sense... and sorry about flogging the dead horse...

Jiri
--
If you want an answer, please mail to <jirib@cs.monash.edu.au>.
On sweeney, I may delete without reading!
PGP 463A14D5 (but it's at home so it'll take a day or two)




Thread