1995-08-18 - Re: I need exportable crypto revisited.

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c4478b779d2547b647d0b95c5175c1e005cb4d3227b5953aabc15dad443901fc
Message ID: <199508180458.AAA11401@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-18 05:02:12 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 17 Aug 95 22:02:12 PDT

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 95 22:02:12 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: I need exportable crypto revisited.
Message-ID: <199508180458.AAA11401@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <199508180030.RAA04988@mycroft.rand.org>, jim@acm.org (Jim
Gillogly) wrote:

>> "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> writes:
>> If you have hooks for arbitrary encryption, you will find it to be
>> virtually impossible to export the product.
>
>That's my understanding also (as I told him in e-mail) but I haven't found
>any legal justification for it. 

You migh as well stop looking, because there isn't any. The brownshirts
have long ago decided that the law means what they say it does. Welcome to
reality.

- -- 
- -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMDQd8ioZzwIn1bdtAQGyEwF9HHGf5vVL0EbVt7RVrXwLlQQUGLF+nFEl
+KP+YB4/JYjjvE9G8By7RlezFhZF3Iy6
=MRsO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread