1995-08-17 - Re: SSL challenge – broken !

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: aba@atlas.ex.ac.uk
Message Hash: cf17e216adf26240ee423488f34d02dfb316e285bc4a42165ddbb2f60827d48c
Message ID: <199508171344.JAA02573@frankenstein.piermont.com>
Reply To: <7033.9508171341@exe.dcs.exeter.ac.uk>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-17 13:46:00 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 17 Aug 95 06:46:00 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 95 06:46:00 PDT
To: aba@atlas.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: SSL challenge -- broken !
In-Reply-To: <7033.9508171341@exe.dcs.exeter.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <199508171344.JAA02573@frankenstein.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



aba@atlas.ex.ac.uk writes:
> The actual key used is the 40 bit key you're bruting, plus what is
> effectively an 88 bit salt (in unix password nomenclature, only unix
> password salts are typically 12 bits).

Yup, you are right. Slipped my mind. (A mind is a terrible thing to
slip...)

.pm

Thread

• Return to August 1995

• Return to “aba@dcs.exeter.ac.uk”

• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”

• 1995-08-17 (Thu, 17 Aug 95 06:42:41 PDT) - Re: SSL challenge – broken ! - aba@dcs.exeter.ac.uk
  • 1995-08-17 (Thu, 17 Aug 95 06:46:00 PDT) - Re: SSL challenge – broken ! - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>