1995-08-25 - Re: SSL Challenge: Are we in trouble?

Header Data

From: Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk>
To: trei@process.com
Message Hash: e0bd2374075cfac733087a00554e8804e79b191e596ca2fd5cab7dd7c9339ec5
Message ID: <“swan.cl.cam.:051560:950825152412”@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Reply To: <9508251423.AA15417@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-25 15:26:10 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 25 Aug 95 08:26:10 PDT

Raw message

From: Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 95 08:26:10 PDT
To: trei@process.com
Subject: Re: SSL Challenge: Are we in trouble?
In-Reply-To: <9508251423.AA15417@toad.com>
Message-ID: <"swan.cl.cam.:051560:950825152412"@cl.cam.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Well, the server appears to be unable to serve cgi scripts - I get 
> '500 - server error' whenever I try. I cannot report the ~500 segments
> I swept overnight, nor get new keyspace.

Try again ...

> I thing it's gotten to the point where the server is the bottleneck on 
> this operation

Has been on & off for some time :-((

> - we seem to have plenty of cpu for sweeps. This will damage our primary
> goal - to demonstrate how fast 40 bits can be swept.

Well, my tertiary goal ...

> Piete, Adam, could you put a note on the /bute/ root page describing the
> server status?

Done.

In brief -- you guessed it -- upgrade to http://www.brute.cl.cam.ac.uk/ftp/pub/
brute/brclient 0.16 and ACK should go a lot quicker, and as people move over 
to using 0.16, so will allocates ...





Thread