1995-08-24 - Re: Spooks and Hackers, etc.

Header Data

From: Scott Brickner <sjb@austin.ibm.com>
To: Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>
Message Hash: fbb6611b4d973c4c5670db484823495a44ae5f527c5bbdbb2351b3b7fb8df971
Message ID: <9508241620.AA13830@ozymandias.austin.ibm.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950819210419.18364G-100000@use.usit.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-08-24 16:21:07 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 24 Aug 95 09:21:07 PDT

Raw message

From: Scott Brickner <sjb@austin.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 95 09:21:07 PDT
To: Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>
Subject: Re: Spooks and Hackers, etc.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950819210419.18364G-100000@use.usit.net>
Message-ID: <9508241620.AA13830@ozymandias.austin.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Brad Dolan writes
>"We need to see that police are surfing the Internet just as other people
>are," Doyle said. "This is a good example of where the law is slower than
>technology."

Duh!  Isn't the law *supposed* to be slower than technology?  It would
take a *complete* idiot to try to make a law about, say, intelligent
programs or uploads or whatever.  It's when law wants to be *faster*
than technology that we get stupidity like the CDA.





Thread