1995-09-17 - Re: Commercial Mixmaster

Header Data

From: hallam@w3.org
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0354cca7f0cc4a3a25dab63cb3f7dca77a1ed8447277839df7c91b80d7679f36
Message ID: <9509172034.AA07230@zorch.w3.org>
Reply To: <199509170513.AA06296@ideath.goldenbear.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-17 20:39:22 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 17 Sep 95 13:39:22 PDT

Raw message

From: hallam@w3.org
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 95 13:39:22 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Commercial Mixmaster
In-Reply-To: <199509170513.AA06296@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Message-ID: <9509172034.AA07230@zorch.w3.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Adam Shostack writes:

>	Its worth noting that the source code to Julf's Penet remailer
> is not public (AFAIK).  People use it becuase they trust Julf, or
> trust people who trust Julf.

I seem to remember that Julf took over Stephie's code from Wizvax which used to 
post into the alt.sex.bondage group. I suspect he has modified it since but I 
don't think that there is much to it. 

Even if Julf released some code there would be no way ofknowing that it was the 
code he runs except by compromising the anonymity of the service itself. In any 
case it is clear that the confidentiality of the service relies entirely on the 
trustworthyness of Julf and the security of the lines into Julfs server. I 
accept the former but can't believe for a moment that every spook and his aunt 
doesn't have a tap on the latter.


How does the cypherpunks remailer work? Does PGP encrypt the signature of a 
message so that the identity of the sender is unknown? Or is it simply PEM style 
encryption so that the DN of the sender is in the clear :-(

I
		Phill




Thread