1995-09-20 - No Subject

Header Data

From: thad@hammerhead.com (Thaddeus J. Beier)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0910edfab5692118ed3661ea8ff2632187537c796be9f6c1de81fd4d178e76ff
Message ID: <199509201630.JAA01430@hammerhead.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-20 16:44:11 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Sep 95 09:44:11 PDT

Raw message

From: thad@hammerhead.com (Thaddeus J. Beier)
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 95 09:44:11 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <199509201630.JAA01430@hammerhead.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I talked to somebody from RSA yesterday, and she said that they
issued a press release yesterday that she expected to see in the
papers today (I didn't see it) and would be on their web site
"soon" that would explain their position.  They say that the
arbitration agreemment maintains the status quo pretty much,
and while it doesn't limit what RSA can do, it severly limits
what Cylink can do.

I think that what RSA needs to do is hire Cylink's PR agency...

thad
-- Thaddeus Beier                   email:  thad@hammerhead.com
   Technology Development             vox:  408) 286-3376
   Hammerhead Productions             fax:  408) 292-8624





Thread