From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
To: aba@atlas.ex.ac.uk
Message Hash: 09a21798d5b0be67cfde78b47f93396dc99501dcbab417f0cd651e46c7ef45d1
Message ID: <9509102303.AA13613@sulphur.osf.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-10 23:04:04 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 16:04:04 PDT
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 95 16:04:04 PDT
To: aba@atlas.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: not a flame please read and think about this
Message-ID: <9509102303.AA13613@sulphur.osf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>I was kind of wandering if it would be necessary to patent something
>just to ensure someone else did patent *your* idea, if you came up
>with one.
Nope.
>Or can you publish, and then say that's prior art, so no one else can
>go patent your idea.
This works. IBM used to have publish a monthly journal (I forget the
name, it came out of one of their Yorktown labs) that did exactly this
kind of thing for exactly this kind of reason. ACtually, they wrote
about stuff that they thought was 5-10 years away.
>> even phil zimmerman is selling the rights to pgp. what about all the
>> people who contributed code (like me) ... . ask phil
>> about me and when i asked about sharing profits from the code i
>> conrtibuted. also about the deal with r.f...
Mr/Ms. Anonymous is lying. His/her name appears nowhere in the credits,
and his/her code appears nowhere in any PGP release. Don't waste any
neurons on it.
/r$
Return to September 1995
Return to “Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>”
1995-09-10 (Sun, 10 Sep 95 16:04:04 PDT) - Re: not a flame please read and think about this - Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>