1995-09-23 - Re: The Next Hack

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 113813649e8dc608401116c3c1dd170502ed6a1aeac7de128cf9bd6a04fd13b0
Message ID: <199509232005.QAA11679@book.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-23 20:07:26 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 23 Sep 95 13:07:26 PDT

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 95 13:07:26 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: The Next Hack
Message-ID: <199509232005.QAA11679@book.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <199509231919.MAA01818@infinity.c2.org>, sameer@c2.org (sameer)
wrote:

>> 
>>   What exactly is the point of this?  We have:
>
>        Is Netscape going to cover the cost of getting the new keys
>that the servers generate signed and certified by Versign? Is netscape
>going to tell its customers that they need to regenerate their
>keys and get new certificates?
>
>        Like I've said, I'm very impressed with netscape's quick
>response and almost everything they've done.

I would be even more impressed if Netscape made their code publicly
available for examination.

- -- 
- -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMGRoeyoZzwIn1bdtAQGg4wF/XTLT2U7mXi2MZ5pgSZQMd9VdLZJcp5MD
wgBWaGCNIzsQnkwB4ZkTyjJAOwFf0OkJ
=+ZRt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread