From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 95 17:13:32 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Child Porn, Morphing, and Pointers
Message-ID: <199509150010.UAA17856@book.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <ac7db05202021004bc61@[205.199.118.202]>, tcmay@got.net
(Timothy C. May) wrote:

>>If I'm reading this correctly, if I Photoshop a kids face onto the body
>>of the latest Playboy centerfold, I'm in violation of this proposed law?
>
>I believe there have already been prosecutions along these lines. For
>example, do you think a _comic book_ with child porn themes ("explicit"
>art, situations) would not be prosecuted as child porn?
>
>I strongly suspect that a _painting_ of a 7-year-old girl engaged in a sex
>act would result in a prosecution.

Any cites?

- -- 
- -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMFjEkSoZzwIn1bdtAQFO5gGAvKEwd8DuWbNAzMtkqQ4BCPrp5YAOWrcu
eSooY922jvZlXV+PYFcamevbR3mZ4bYj
=Jxeu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----