From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1ec2e5e9305061e068f6600b17524a714240ded67fd7ae2e783613e83032a66c
Message ID: <199509221944.PAA06418@book.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-22 19:46:37 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 22 Sep 95 12:46:37 PDT
From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 95 12:46:37 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: The Next Hack
Message-ID: <199509221944.PAA06418@book.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <199509211832.LAA24086@infinity.c2.org>, sameer@c2.org (sameer)
wrote:
>Proposal for action:
>
>1) Reverse-engineer a server to see if the keygen phase uses
>a weak RNG seed. -- if so, determine the exact algorithim.
>
>2) Organize a net-wide search over the space of the RNG seed to
>crack the private key of some well known secure server.
>
>3) Release the private key to the net.
Count me in. Let's start with Netscape's own.
- --
- -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
PGP encrypted mail preferred.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
iQBFAwUBMGMSJSoZzwIn1bdtAQFqiwF+IZKDv1t5Q2va2yE2JZMCHGITkxoDHHML
alvjYK+XyxPNaVGgRgMk5gTsZMcHqBvz
=meVk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to September 1995
Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”
1995-09-22 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 12:46:37 PDT) - Re: The Next Hack - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)