1995-09-06 - Re: Another Son of Clipper discussion paper

Header Data

From: m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
To: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Message Hash: 3af287c887e20cd0d7b50fac02bf5ecfc3f3913ab49ce621eb5930bebac770e3
Message ID: <9509061312.AA12676@alpha>
Reply To: <v02120d08ac72acec4bb0@[192.0.2.1]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-06 13:13:41 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 6 Sep 95 06:13:41 PDT

Raw message

From: m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 95 06:13:41 PDT
To: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Subject: Re: Another Son of Clipper discussion paper
In-Reply-To: <v02120d08ac72acec4bb0@[192.0.2.1]>
Message-ID: <9509061312.AA12676@alpha>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Lucky Green writes:
 > Windows 95 is on a lot of people's hard drives. It is therefore public and
 > available for every one's inspection.  How many people do you know that
 > have reverse engineered Windows 95. How many of those use a reverse
 > engineered version. I'd venture it is zero out of zero.

Problems with this analogy:

1) Windows 95 is somewhat bigger than your typical encryption
routine;

2) The factor of motivation isn't considered.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| Nobody's going to listen to you if you just | Mike McNally (m5@tivoli.com) |
| stand there and flap your arms like a fish. | Tivoli Systems, Austin TX    |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




Thread