1995-09-11 - Re: Digital Fingerprinting
Header Data
From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: 40fe2321a24a2dc288a9e9f74a3104d48fe043975d27a53bd1e7a8f1a108b431
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950911054528.26534B-100000@panix.com>
Reply To: <ac78f5a804021004b64e@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-11 09:48:08 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 11 Sep 95 02:48:08 PDT
Raw message
From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 95 02:48:08 PDT
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: Digital Fingerprinting
In-Reply-To: <ac78f5a804021004b64e@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950911054528.26534B-100000@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Sun, 10 Sep 1995, Timothy C. May wrote:
> If a piece of mail addressed to me is found littering the highway, can I be
> convicted of littering? No, because the _provenance_ of that item of mail
> cannot be determined...it might have accidentally blown out of a trash
> truch delivering my mail to the dump, for example.
I'm afraid that they are busting people in New York for recycling
violations when they find mail addressed to them mixed in with household
garbage in public trash cans.
DCF
Thread
Return to September 1995
- Return to “Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>”
- Return to “Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>”
Return to “tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)”
- 1995-09-11 (Sun, 10 Sep 95 20:26:09 PDT) - Re: Digital Fingerprinting - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1995-09-11 (Mon, 11 Sep 95 02:48:08 PDT) - Re: Digital Fingerprinting - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
- 1995-09-12 (Mon, 11 Sep 95 23:08:55 PDT) - Re: Digital Fingerprinting - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
- 1995-09-11 (Mon, 11 Sep 95 02:48:08 PDT) - Re: Digital Fingerprinting - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>