From: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: karlton@netscape.com (Phil Karlton)
Message Hash: 450c440b7f0726f61686394011d045ffdf85dd63dac4b8c6f79c1fe86416416c
Message ID: <199509210531.WAA09687@blob.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-21 05:32:16 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Sep 95 22:32:16 PDT
From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 95 22:32:16 PDT
To: karlton@netscape.com (Phil Karlton)
Subject: Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape
Message-ID: <199509210531.WAA09687@blob.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 05:01 PM 9/20/95 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>PC timers inherently run at Mhz speed -- they interrupt every 100th of
>a second but you can get finer resolution by querying the clock
>chip. Does Windows let you do this?
Yes: 1.196 MHz precision.
The VTD maintains a 64-bit value that is accurate to 0.8 microseconds. This
value is obtained by calling the VTD with AX set to 0100h. The 64-bit value
is returned in EDX:EAX. The returned value indicates the time Windows has
been running based on a 1.196 MHz clock.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com
Return to September 1995
Return to ““James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>”
1995-09-21 (Wed, 20 Sep 95 22:32:16 PDT) - Re: “random” number seeds vs. Netscape - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>