From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@polaris.mindport.net>
To: Greg Broiles <greg@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Message Hash: 4c687f9cf0c53792ea9498c72076dc28d6818a8634d6cd23609c58155aab84db
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950917183137.17849B-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Reply To: <199509162015.AA03916@ideath.goldenbear.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-17 22:39:01 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 17 Sep 95 15:39:01 PDT
From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@polaris.mindport.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 95 15:39:01 PDT
To: Greg Broiles <greg@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Subject: Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
In-Reply-To: <199509162015.AA03916@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950917183137.17849B-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Sat, 16 Sep 1995, Greg Broiles wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Black Unicorn writes:
> > Some months ago I called for advanced stego and stealth PGP as well as
> > larger keys in the event we all had to go "into the crypto closet" for a
> > time.
>
> > I call for them again.
>
> I know of three ways to get software:
>
> 1. Write it yourself.
I've admitted before I program as well as a carp. (No, not Mr. Carp)
> 2. Pay someone else to write it.
I don't think that e.g., a stealth PGP would demand much of a fee, or
that such a fee would make many of the people involved in the various\
intellectual rights of the program happy.
I might add that I don't want the software for myself, I want it for the
effect it will have on potential legislation/enforcement.
If some other 'punks want to get together and fund such projects, I will
participate. However, putting the burden of financing this venture
(which will have no immediate economic return, as I will support no
venture which does not result in fully public software) entirely on my
shoulders just because I happen to believe it will soon be necessary to
maintain any strong crypto ability, is unrealistic, and I believe you
know it.
> 3. Find software someone else wrote that meets your needs.
I'm working on 3, I don't believe it exists.
> If (3) isn't working, perhaps you should try (1) or (2).
>
> (I've been "calling for" a big house with a hot tub for years now.
> Still no progress. I'll let you know if it works out.)
Cute, but that's about all.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.2
>
> iQCVAwUBMFswPX3YhjZY3fMNAQHatwP/ZJKuNEDRPdCldyvshGkG/w/io+37zx3m
> DyJ4h1+OicxYCtKbolXYVcX8C4d1j7hXY2sesepcDvYYyy+butdQ+/2tw3u0FW1j
> WpfCGURpypBVb5T7QlL21Qv39cBIu9mJxkasPkQSeSnrC24eGtoItmZzrIRZgJyj
> Dj2FOIfxiFY=
> =5DwJ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
---
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Return to September 1995
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”