From: crocker@cybercash.com (Stephen D. Crocker)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5336d3d54b2073409983f6094541d6660a6a201a4e377ea4bf6531494076c061
Message ID: <ac88be5b140210046d3f@[204.254.34.75]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-23 00:52:27 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 22 Sep 95 17:52:27 PDT
From: crocker@cybercash.com (Stephen D. Crocker)
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 95 17:52:27 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Pitfall in producing random numbers
Message-ID: <ac88be5b140210046d3f@[204.254.34.75]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 2:20 AM 9/22/95, Norman Hardy wrote:
>The virtual PC clock proceeded forward by very predictable
>manner. Perhaps the details were different but the nature of the pitfall is
>clear. I did not notice that pitfall mentioned in RFC 1750. (Its the only
>hazard that I know of that they missed.)
Neat! I often talk about what happens if inter-keystroke timingis used but
the program is driven by a script. In essence, running a program under
simulation amounts to running the clock under a script.
Next version.
Thanks,
Steve
--------------------
Steve Crocker Main: +1 703 620 4200
CyberCash, Inc., Suite 430 Desk: +1 703 716 5214
2100 Reston Parkway Fax: +1 703 620 4215
Reston, VA 22091 crocker@cybercash.com
Return to September 1995
Return to “crocker@cybercash.com (Stephen D. Crocker)”
1995-09-23 (Fri, 22 Sep 95 17:52:27 PDT) - Re: Pitfall in producing random numbers - crocker@cybercash.com (Stephen D. Crocker)