1995-09-27 - Re: cypherpunk press releases vs. FAQ

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 54583d59c98a087b2e82d2efd57fa734f55dd9c174e31dfe759406a9c6496a7e
Message ID: <199509270032.UAA16680@frankenstein.piermont.com>
Reply To: <199509262141.OAA24578@netcom8.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-27 00:32:21 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 26 Sep 95 17:32:21 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 95 17:32:21 PDT
To: "Vladimir Z. Nuri" <vznuri@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: cypherpunk press releases vs. FAQ
In-Reply-To: <199509262141.OAA24578@netcom8.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199509270032.UAA16680@frankenstein.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



"Vladimir Z. Nuri" writes:
> earlier I advocated a press release mechanism, and this is getting
> flamed to smithereens by the more libertarian/cryptoanarchists
> elements of the group, as I predicted (but geez, accusing me
> of *deliberately* trying to start a flamewar here really hurts
> my feelings! if I were really that mischievous, the meager return would
> be quite an insult to my expertise.. <g>).

So you admit that you are, in fact, Detweiler. As if there was
any doubt.

> what I had in mind was a more FAQ-like cypherpunks document,

There is nothing wrong with Tim's document, which already exists.

Perry





Thread