From: hallam@w3.org
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 95 11:41:12 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Netscpae & Fortezza (Or, say it Ain't so, Jeff?)
In-Reply-To: <199509290659.XAA09185@ix7.ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <9509291841.AA29412@zorch.w3.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>I for one am against any kind of GAK on moral grounds.  I also think
>that trying to implement mandatory GAK in a software only system
>would be a nightmare.

If people care to look at my very old Shen work they will see a key
escrow facility. This was installed becase as a network administrator
at a sensitive site.

I'm a big fan of key escrow. I just don't think I should be forced to 
use it on a public network by a government. I need the ability to secure 
internal channels inside certain sites however. I don't think I want the 
Whitehouse running with each staffer providing their own personal encryption 
system.


	Phill.