From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 95 08:25:06 PDT
To: "Rev. Ben" <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: WAS_tem
Message-ID: <199509141524.IAA00532@blob.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>> The bill would expand the definition of child pornography 
>> to include any [...] 
>> image produced by any means, including electronically by 
>> computer, if it depicts or appears to depict a minor 
>> engaging in sexually explicit conduct. 

At 10:40 AM 9/14/95 -0400, Rev. Ben wrote:
>If I'm reading this correctly, if I Photoshop a kids face onto the body 
>of the latest Playboy centerfold, I'm in violation of this proposed law?

If you draw a picture using paintbrush of an underage person engaging
in sexual conduct, you are in violation of this proposed legislation.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com