From: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: Jonathan Blake <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 705025a249515807b0edf5ee00cb71e4a2260f703bb651afa5d301848a4a2678
Message ID: <199509270616.XAA16763@blob.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-27 06:16:32 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 26 Sep 95 23:16:32 PDT
From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 95 23:16:32 PDT
To: Jonathan Blake <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Fax encryption software
Message-ID: <199509270616.XAA16763@blob.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 09:34 PM 9/26/95 -0700, Jonathan Blake wrote:
>
> I saw this article in alt.privacy.
>
> Anybody think the described encryption actually is worth
> looking at.
>
> We are talking about a 72 bit engine that is more than
> sufficiently strong for time sensitive general business purposes.
Since David does not know the difference between CPU word
width and an encryption algorithm, I think it is safe to
ignore him.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com
Return to September 1995
Return to ““James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>”
1995-09-27 (Tue, 26 Sep 95 23:16:32 PDT) - Re: Fax encryption software - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>