1995-09-27 - Re: Fax encryption software

Header Data

From: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: Jonathan Blake <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 705025a249515807b0edf5ee00cb71e4a2260f703bb651afa5d301848a4a2678
Message ID: <199509270616.XAA16763@blob.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-27 06:16:32 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 26 Sep 95 23:16:32 PDT

Raw message

From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 95 23:16:32 PDT
To: Jonathan Blake <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Fax encryption software
Message-ID: <199509270616.XAA16763@blob.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 09:34 PM 9/26/95 -0700, Jonathan Blake wrote:
>
>	I saw this article in alt.privacy.
>
>	Anybody think the described encryption actually is worth 
>	looking at.
>
> We are talking about a 72 bit engine that is more than 
> sufficiently strong for time sensitive general business purposes. 

Since David does not know the difference between CPU word
width and an encryption algorithm, I think it is safe to 
ignore him.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread