From: hallam@w3.org
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 720ee0604f075c0c6ba258e40b1d65c79863bde7d2b9fe88b5f651091943b0b1
Message ID: <9509080216.AA07325@zorch.w3.org>
Reply To: <Pine.BSD.3.91.950907180215.790B-100000@usr2.primenet.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-08 02:17:10 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 7 Sep 95 19:17:10 PDT
From: hallam@w3.org
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 95 19:17:10 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: ON OFF-TOPIC
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSD.3.91.950907180215.790B-100000@usr2.primenet.com>
Message-ID: <9509080216.AA07325@zorch.w3.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>Nope. but the patriots & the cyPHerpunks share a common goal, and belief
>that it is none of the government's business what we think or want to
>share with our computers.
Poor you, the only major political party to come out with a pro crypto statement
is a socialist party.
The problem is currently with the right wing, right wing democrats such as
Clinton and practically all the Republicans.
Crypto is outsi]de the left right debate which centers on ecconomic goals,
whether to help the poor or the rich. The crypto debate is on the
authoritarian/libertarian axis which is orthogonal. Geroge Orwell was a
socialist, John Stuart Mill a Liberal, both had very anti-authoritarian views
which used to be known as libertarian.
If you want a debate on how to convince the authoritarians then perhaps you will
get some interest. Trying to make crypto control out to be a left/right or
pro/anti gun control issue is no more relevant than the pro/anti abortion
debate.
Phill
Return to September 1995
Return to “Yih-Chun Hu <yihchun@u.washington.edu>”