1995-09-01 - Re: SSL search attack
Header Data
From: m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
To: Scott Brickner <sjb@austin.ibm.com>
Message Hash: 725c4e448cc0b98a408f81bcb7734d289eba17b4d635e90a96c7c907a5315568
Message ID: <9509011721.AA07870@alpha>
Reply To: <9509011648.AA07795@alpha>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-01 17:22:29 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 1 Sep 95 10:22:29 PDT
Raw message
From: m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 95 10:22:29 PDT
To: Scott Brickner <sjb@austin.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: SSL search attack
In-Reply-To: <9509011648.AA07795@alpha>
Message-ID: <9509011721.AA07870@alpha>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Scott Brickner writes:
> I think your assumption that available CPU is approximately constant
> is incorrect. Different participants have different constraints...
Hmm. I suppose that's probably true for some more than others.
Again, hmm.
> Also, the "subscription" process is somewhat discouraging to those
> who participate for the prize.
Ah. That looks like one of those little details that got by me.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| Nobody's going to listen to you if you just | Mike McNally (m5@tivoli.com) |
| stand there and flap your arms like a fish. | Tivoli Systems, Austin TX |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thread
Return to September 1995
- Return to “droelke@rdxsunhost.aud.alcatel.com (Daniel R. Oelke)”
- Return to “m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)”
Return to “Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk>”
- 1995-09-01 (Fri, 1 Sep 95 06:27:10 PDT) - Re: SSL search attack - droelke@rdxsunhost.aud.alcatel.com (Daniel R. Oelke)
- 1995-09-01 (Fri, 1 Sep 95 08:50:47 PDT) - Re: SSL search attack - Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk>
- 1995-09-01 (Fri, 1 Sep 95 09:49:10 PDT) - Re: SSL search attack - m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
- 1995-09-01 (Fri, 1 Sep 95 10:22:29 PDT) - Re: SSL search attack - m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)