From: keelings@wu1.wl.aecl.ca (S. Keeling)
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 95 13:12:22 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: WAS_tem (fwd)
Message-ID: <9509162012.AA29482@wu1.wl.aecl.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Incoming from Rev. Ben:
> 
> On Thu, 14 Sep 1995, James A. Donald wrote:
> 
> > If you draw a picture using paintbrush of an underage person engaging
> > in sexual conduct, you are in violation of this proposed legislation.
> 
> Doesn't that directly contradict the stated purpose of existing child 
[snip]
> 
> Do the lawyers on the list want to pipe up?

	On cypherpunks?!?  Whatever for?  I imagine there's already a
rousing discussion going on about this somewhere in AOL.  Take it there.

-- 

 "Remember, obsolescence (Win95) isn't an accident;  it's an art form!" 
   keelings@wu1.wl.aecl.ca       s. keeling,   aecl - whiteshell labs