From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7b898468b652c79de347d737b47b8b2471fb2151480e1b1fec47a950c4d86afa
Message ID: <199509271930.PAA28222@book.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-27 19:32:52 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 27 Sep 95 12:32:52 PDT
From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 95 12:32:52 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Fax encryption software
Message-ID: <199509271930.PAA28222@book.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <Pine.3.89.9509262116.A7081-0100000@netcom7>,
grafolog@netcom.com (Jonathan Blake) wrote:
> I saw this article in alt.privacy.
>
> Anybody think the described encryption actually is worth
> looking at.
[...]
>We are talking about a 72 bit engine that is more than
>sufficiently strong for time sensitive general business purposes.
[...]
>>>It is fully licensed, without restriction for export, by the
>U.S.
>>>Department of Commerce. NO PGP WORRIES.
These two statements are mutually exclusive. Snakeoil.
- --
- -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
PGP encrypted mail preferred.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
iQBFAwUBMGmmZyoZzwIn1bdtAQFrsQF/edmKXMashWa+yP9E4N/M0c/Rgwa4I6rm
0g0K8TzPc8hl4dP01Euiqcm1LAgHqbiL
=rRO8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to September 1995
Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”
1995-09-27 (Wed, 27 Sep 95 12:32:52 PDT) - Re: Fax encryption software - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)