From: “Rev. Mark Grant” <mark@unicorn.com>
To: Tom Rollins <trollins@hns.com>
Message Hash: 7e52bfeb9343f389b77bfb8c79c561165f12a32924816864ebd4542220e652fa
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9509081833.A4038-0100000@unicorn.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-08 17:23:40 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Sep 95 10:23:40 PDT
From: "Rev. Mark Grant" <mark@unicorn.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 95 10:23:40 PDT
To: Tom Rollins <trollins@hns.com>
Subject: Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and fails?
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9509081833.A4038-0100000@unicorn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 8 Sep 1995, Tom Rollins wrote:
> I took a look at the FACTNet web page. There is a file encrypted with
> PGP using the "-c" option. They are asking for people to help guess
> the Pass Phrase. Why would anyone bother if they had no clue that the
> file contained anything 'interesting'.
I can only assume one of two things - either this is a joke, as the
decrypted contents are nothing special as far as I can see (though
'interesting' in a sense), or that someone is very, very clever and
managed to hide two different messages in there with different
passphrases.
> If this is the file that the Co$ is trying to crack, then what the
> is being asked for is a pass phrase that can be handed to the Co$ that
> will pass the PGP valid key check and still not decrypt the data to
> anything usefull.
If this is the file the Co$ want to crack, they're a) clearly
cryptographically inept, and b) the joke's clearly on them 8-).. Any
hacker worthy of the name ought to get the passphrase within three
attempts (I got it first time).
Note for paranoids: Of course, this message may just be a ruse to put
the Co$ off the scent ;-)..
Mark
Return to September 1995
Return to “trollins@hns.com (Tom Rollins)”