1995-09-28 - Re: Netscpae & Fortezza (Or, say it Ain’t so, Jeff?)

Header Data

From: jsw@neon.netscape.com (Jeff Weinstein)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 825cced29b573051917084defd84e520e9d5a779383817e7269c001355714345
Message ID: <44f98a$mu5@tera.mcom.com>
Reply To: <199509281309.JAA12017@bwh.harvard.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-28 22:58:07 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 28 Sep 95 15:58:07 PDT

Raw message

From: jsw@neon.netscape.com (Jeff Weinstein)
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 95 15:58:07 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Netscpae & Fortezza (Or, say it Ain't so, Jeff?)
In-Reply-To: <199509281309.JAA12017@bwh.harvard.edu>
Message-ID: <44f98a$mu5@tera.mcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In article <199509281309.JAA12017@bwh.harvard.edu>, adam@bwh.harvard.edu (Adam Shostack) writes:
> This came across the SSL mailing list.  Anyone know Taher's position
> on key-escrow?

  Just because we may do fortezza support for customers who want it
does not mean that we will force key escrow on the rest of the world.
I for one am against any kind of GAK on moral grounds.  I also think
that trying to implement mandatory GAK in a software only system
would be a nightmare.

	--Jeff

-- 
Jeff Weinstein - Electronic Munitions Specialist
Netscape Communication Corporation
jsw@netscape.com - http://home.netscape.com/people/jsw
Any opinions expressed above are mine.





Thread