From: jsw@neon.netscape.com (Jeff Weinstein)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 89d95604f0f1beab8004deac612eb81d8a39d9366df769ce1e60aa326f82773a
Message ID: <44cnah$q0n@tera.mcom.com>
Reply To: <445hej$h03@tera.mcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-27 23:39:53 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 27 Sep 95 16:39:53 PDT
From: jsw@neon.netscape.com (Jeff Weinstein)
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 95 16:39:53 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Netscape for Linux?
In-Reply-To: <445hej$h03@tera.mcom.com>
Message-ID: <44cnah$q0n@tera.mcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In article <199509251135.HAA13693@frankenstein.piermont.com>, perry@piermont.com (Perry E. Metzger) writes:
> Jeff Weinstein writes:
> > > ... would be nice if we could get 128 bit keys, though ... (hint,
> > > hint).
> >
> > We are working this issue with the government. As soon as we can
> > make it available for download we will.
> In other words, we will never see it in our lifetimes -- the
> bureaucreeps aren't known for promoting the spread of strong crypto.
Where did I imply that if the govt. ignored us or said no that we
would meekly go away with tail between legs?
> By the by, are you guys going to be taking any action vis a vis the
> discovery of weak keys in RC4?
We are talking to RSA about this, since our crypto code is based
on BSAFE code we got from them.
--Jeff
--
Jeff Weinstein - Electronic Munitions Specialist
Netscape Communication Corporation
jsw@netscape.com - http://home.netscape.com/people/jsw
Any opinions expressed above are mine.
Return to September 1995
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”