From: Bryce Wilcox <wilcoxb@nag.cs.colorado.edu>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 95 17:20:55 PDT
To: hallam@w3.org
Subject: Re: Are booby-trapped computers legal?
In-Reply-To: <9509061938.AA02249@zorch.w3.org>
Message-ID: <199509070020.SAA01751@nag.cs.colorado.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> There is no self defense argument where the purpose is not to prevent
> physical harm. 


If this were a political philosophy list I would state that self-defense
justification often extends to property (As I believe it should).  Since 
this is a cryptography-and-social-changes-thereof list I will refrain...


> People who go round drawing parallels to gun ownership and cryptography 
> ownership are simply playing into the governments hands.
<snip>


No!  Stop!  Don't say it!  PLEASE go post this message to 
alt.security, talk.politics.guns and alt.fan.david-sternlight and keep it 
away from this list...


Bryce (toss in alt.flame while you are at it...)

signatures follow:


                                    +                                           
      public key on keyservers      /.      island Life in a chaos sea        
      or via finger 0x617c6db9      /           bryce.wilcox@colorado.edu     
                                    ---*                                     

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Auto-signed with Bryce's Auto-PGP v1.0beta3

iQCVAwUBME46vvWZSllhfG25AQEX9QP9HpngGnwA1rSEo7knTJ8RalpK9HbZm0u/
SkO6blQCV8kqcYxN5uZTFefCQPjTakEaUv8YnWpHNGOfFIu8igNOGMTCTV6ptVEy
rYKqupcycYXugN7XGdgQH2UNCUO2M59FpBC65nm4FB05ZUrwYyz0weeCkmxDTZHP
1FKRnjXpWrU=
=b3yP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----