1995-09-03 - Re: Basic Public key algorithms.

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: droelke@rdxsunhost.aud.alcatel.com (Daniel R. Oelke)
Message Hash: 9255da395bc3314cff1b46cd8d4ff1d0b2d9981706610e4fadfb8328386f6401
Message ID: <199509021813.OAA29335@frankenstein.piermont.com>
Reply To: <9509021801.AA07301@spirit.aud.alcatel.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-03 07:34:32 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Sep 95 00:34:32 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 95 00:34:32 PDT
To: droelke@rdxsunhost.aud.alcatel.com (Daniel R. Oelke)
Subject: Re: Basic Public key algorithms.
In-Reply-To: <9509021801.AA07301@spirit.aud.alcatel.com>
Message-ID: <199509021813.OAA29335@frankenstein.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Daniel R. Oelke writes:
> I could use RSA (which is well described in many sources, and has
> RSAREF out there),  but I want to avoid the patent issue if possible.  
> The sci.crypt FAQ mentions that there are other methods but that 
> is about all it says.  Are there any that are not patented?

No, because one patent covers public key cryptography itself, and not
a particular method.

.pm





Thread