1995-09-20 - Re: Please send me SSL problems…

Header Data

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
To: fair@clock.org
Message Hash: 99699aa62b9914934bf9409692a3571eb38a200a4b53aea011fa3d96474037f3
Message ID: <9509201715.AA19393@sulphur.osf.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-20 17:15:55 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Sep 95 10:15:55 PDT

Raw message

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 95 10:15:55 PDT
To: fair@clock.org
Subject: Re: Please send me SSL problems...
Message-ID: <9509201715.AA19393@sulphur.osf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>From what I can see, GSSAPI has broad acceptance and will soon have broad
use.

I've heard that Digital, HP, and IBM have all mandated that all security
code (except keymgmt and other things that are out of scope) must go
through the GSSAPI:  no writing your own stuff.  I heard, less
authoritatively, that Microsoft has the same rules, except they use a
FunnyLookingVariant(far) of an earlier GSSAPI draft.
	/r$






Thread