From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9e6df4807dd049f94acb2e802dcbfa7c7a2847e843747754d79e49de6ff09530
Message ID: <199509031238.IAA19949@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-03 12:38:29 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Sep 95 05:38:29 PDT
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 95 05:38:29 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: ARS_tug
Message-ID: <199509031238.IAA19949@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
9-3-95. NYPaper:
"Aircraft Carrier May Give Way To Missile Ship."
The aircraft carrier may soon be shoved off center stage
by a new "arsenal ship" that would be able to rain 500
missiles within a matter of minutes on targets hundreds
of miles away, without risking pilots' lives. A carrier
costs $4.5 billion to build and $440 million a year to
operate. The new ship, essentially a floating missile
barge, might cost only $500 million and just tens of
millions a year to run. The new ship would fire Tomahawk
cruise missiles, long-range artillery shells or rocket
barrages against ammunition dumps, command posts and
artillery. It could prove particularly valuable in the
early stages of a crisis, before ground troops were in
place. It would travel with other ships and submarines
for protection, and target information would be provided
by other vessels, reconnaissance aircraft, pilotless
drones or ground spotters. The 825-foot ship might
require fewer than 20 people to operate, compared with
the 5,000 aboard a 1,040-foot carrier.
ARS_tug
Return to September 1995
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
1995-09-03 (Sun, 3 Sep 95 05:38:29 PDT) - ARS_tug - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>