From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
To: perry@piermont.com
Message Hash: 9e8cdf2cd45ca83d2688b10c7103e63cf087c411e128c09f8c86adb244f44bd1
Message ID: <9509201631.AA19151@sulphur.osf.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-20 16:32:31 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Sep 95 09:32:31 PDT
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 95 09:32:31 PDT
To: perry@piermont.com
Subject: Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
Message-ID: <9509201631.AA19151@sulphur.osf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> You could do that, but thats not how C does things. C allocates these
> things on the stack.
Nope. Just because almost all machines anyone is every going to use
in their lifetimes are stack-based doesn't mean C is stack-based.
The C compiler I once used on a LispMachine had no stack.
/r$
Return to September 1995
Return to “Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>”