From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a1912fe3bf8143800b14d674c370f91e8cde1c988918a6d1536bbc5083b8c3ba
Message ID: <199509260246.WAA20098@book.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-26 13:16:16 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 26 Sep 95 06:16:16 PDT
From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 95 06:16:16 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Golden Coy Freeh
Message-ID: <199509260246.WAA20098@book.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <Pine.SUN.3.91.950925144659.21198A-100000@nic.cerf.net>,
paulp@CERF.NET (Paul Phillips) wrote:
>On Mon, 25 Sep 1995, John Young wrote:
[...]
>> If the head of the F.B.I. acknowledged that his agency was
>> powerless to crack a cryptography program like Pretty Good
>> Privacy, the stampede for that software on the Internet
>> would make the run on Windows 95 look puny.
>
>That's a bizarre and naive statement. Is there anyone that thinks the
>spread of strong crypto has been less than rapid only because people are
>afraid it won't protect them against the government? Um, sorry, no.
The general public doesn't use PGP. If the FBI director admitted that
using PGP is safe even against the FBI, the general public just might
become aware of it. Perhaps the statement isn't so naive after all.
- --
- -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
PGP encrypted mail preferred.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
iQBFAwUBMGdpbioZzwIn1bdtAQG5zwGAmmSuPLdrDV9rBAUmJFuywUC4x1KgeVqP
HiD9C8pP+L5xkZw8pyH8xhwfKPZeKOHb
=w1IS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to September 1995
Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”
1995-09-26 (Tue, 26 Sep 95 06:16:16 PDT) - Re: Golden Coy Freeh - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)