From: dsc@swcp.com (Dar Scott)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: afb4b44730752ac622cca9a4bab2d5f416e0c35f7c2e1a0ff4c1c06c0025a74a
Message ID: <v01510103ac7d2135f391@[198.59.115.127]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-14 00:05:23 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 13 Sep 95 17:05:23 PDT
From: dsc@swcp.com (Dar Scott)
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 95 17:05:23 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
Message-ID: <v01510103ac7d2135f391@[198.59.115.127]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Black Unicorn wrote,
>But won't clients insist on proper credentials in one form or another?
Yes.
>Doesn't the practicality and accountability of a centralized authority
>(or several authorities) provide the best answer to this?
No.
>Who is going
>to accept my signature promising that I did indeed get a law degree and
>pass the bar?
Very few.
Certification can be from multiple private and
government organizations and might vary depending
on the type of legal service (or other lawyer service)
needed. Licensing can only be done by an
entity that can use physical force to prevent
buying and selling legal services.
>I don't see how the net will eliminate the basic need for highly
>qualified professionals and the proof that they have credentials.
It won't. The needs might shift a little but they
will be there.
>Perhaps diplomas and such will be transfered into digital signatures for
>the institutions, but I can't see how this "cracks" any "monopoly."
>Perhaps the monopoly is shifted to those who have diplomas, rather than
>those "licensed to practice" but so what?
It might "crack" government enforced monopoly.
Should a market monopoly survive some form of
crypto-anarchy it would be in the form of a
certification entity that does such a good and
efficient job that it is very hard to break
into the business. Not so bad if it happens,
but much more honest, efficient and softer-edged
than "licensed to practice". I suspect that
people have needs for varying levels and varying
specializations so that several kinds of
certifications may develop and might be supplied
by multiple entities.
I suspect that many people would want a
certification that a lawyer meets the usual
licensing requirements of the outside world.
Who knows, maybe that would be the most popular kind.
But it won't be the only kind.
Dar
===========================================================
Dar Scott Home phone: +1 505 299 9497
Dar Scott Consulting Voice: +1 505 299 5790
8637 Horacio Place NE Email: darscott@aol.com
Albuquerque, NM 87111 dsc@swcp.com
Fax: +1 505 898 6525
http://www.swcp.com/~correspo/DSC/DarScott.html
===========================================================
Return to September 1995
Return to “dsc@swcp.com (Dar Scott)”
1995-09-14 (Wed, 13 Sep 95 17:05:23 PDT) - Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers? - dsc@swcp.com (Dar Scott)