1995-09-22 - Re: “Gnusaic”? Why not a Gnu-Style Web Browser?

Header Data

From: Stephan Somogyi <somogyi@digmedia.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: bf7a44e1bb0f2b2e87f79e6f3b7d10ba4820ce667a07f232d6a23d8bfc429ba1
Message ID: <v03003400ac88a55e4e4b@[198.93.25.99]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-22 17:45:53 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 22 Sep 95 10:45:53 PDT

Raw message

From: Stephan Somogyi <somogyi@digmedia.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 95 10:45:53 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "Gnusaic"? Why not a Gnu-Style Web Browser?
Message-ID: <v03003400ac88a55e4e4b@[198.93.25.99]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 23:23 21.9.95, Alex Tang wrote:

> Yes.  This has been done.  A set of patches for NCSA's HTTPd (for US
> folks only) can be found at
>
>       http://petrified.cic.net/~altitude/ssl/howto.html
>
> I got the patches from the ssleay gang in AU, but i haven't seen them on
> their ftp site yet, so if you're outside the states, it'll be available
> rsn (i think...)

Has anyone already created the necessary patches for Apache
<http://www.apache.org/>, or does anyone know whether the Apache dev
team would be amenable to including conditional directives to allow the
build of a secure version? If anyone is thinking of making the effort
to create a publicly available secure server, Apache's probably the
best source base to work with.

________________________________________________________________________
Stephan Somogyi            Think Tank Grenadier            Digital Media







Thread