1995-09-05 - Re: SSLRef (SSLtelnet)

Header Data

From: hallam@w3.org
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c2c5dbc41b0341130bf2427b0cb732b77e89268a3467588c2174524c4f43257c
Message ID: <9509052222.AA31819@zorch.w3.org>
Reply To: <199509051940.VAA26244@utopia.hacktic.nl>
UTC Datetime: 1995-09-05 22:23:36 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 5 Sep 95 15:23:36 PDT

Raw message

From: hallam@w3.org
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 95 15:23:36 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: SSLRef (SSLtelnet)
In-Reply-To: <199509051940.VAA26244@utopia.hacktic.nl>
Message-ID: <9509052222.AA31819@zorch.w3.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>Is it possible that since this was only a "test" CA, that netscape used
>less than a full-strength key?  If it was only 512 bits or so, we could
>try cracking it.

Netscapes test cert is for a 1024 bit key


	Phill

Thread

• Return to September 1995

• Return to “anon-remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl (Name Withheld by Request)”
• Return to “Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>”

• Return to “hallam@w3.org”

• 1995-09-05 (Mon, 4 Sep 95 21:19:00 PDT) - Re: SSLRef (SSLtelnet) - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
  • 1995-09-05 (Tue, 5 Sep 95 14:06:19 PDT) - Re: SSLRef (SSLtelnet) - anon-remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl (Name Withheld by Request)
    • 1995-09-05 (Tue, 5 Sep 95 15:23:36 PDT) - Re: SSLRef (SSLtelnet) - hallam@w3.org